top of page

The Inefficiencies of Electronic Health Records: A Burden of Busy Work


Electronic Health Records (EHRs) were once hailed as a transformative innovation, promising to streamline healthcare processes, improve patient outcomes, and reduce administrative burdens. However, as healthcare systems adopted EHRs on a widespread scale, the promised efficiency gains have been overshadowed by the emergence of new challenges. One of the most pressing concerns is the rise of busy work, where healthcare professionals find themselves entangled in excessive administrative tasks and data entry, hampering their ability to focus on patient care. In this article, we explore the inefficiencies of EHRs and their role in generating busy work, backed by relevant references.

1. Overwhelming Data Entry Requirements

EHR systems require meticulous data entry to capture patient information accurately. However, studies have shown that healthcare providers spend an inordinate amount of time on data entry tasks, detracting from valuable patient interaction time. A study conducted by the American Medical Association (AMA) found that physicians spend, on average, about two hours on EHR tasks for every one hour of direct patient care (1). This disproportionate allocation of time to administrative duties is a significant contributor to busy work in healthcare settings.

2. Lack of Interoperability

Interoperability is essential for the seamless exchange of patient information between different healthcare providers and systems. Unfortunately, the lack of standardized data formats and interoperability among various EHR vendors leads to disjointed patient records and duplication of efforts. A survey published in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association reported that only 30% of hospitals are able to exchange EHR data with external healthcare organizations (2). Consequently, healthcare professionals often find themselves navigating between multiple systems to access relevant patient information, leading to inefficiencies and increased workload.

3. Alert Fatigue

EHRs are equipped with alert systems to flag potential issues, such as drug interactions or critical patient conditions. However, the excessive number of alerts, many of which are false alarms or redundant, can lead to alert fatigue among healthcare providers. A study in the Journal of the American College of Radiology revealed that radiologists reported missing critical alerts due to the overwhelming number of non-urgent alerts they receive (3). This alert overload contributes to busy work as healthcare professionals spend valuable time sorting through numerous notifications.

4. Documentation Requirements

EHRs necessitate extensive documentation to meet regulatory compliance and legal standards. The pressure to record every detail can lead to "copy-pasting" of information, a practice known as "note bloat." This not only compromises the accuracy of patient records but also forces healthcare providers to spend considerable time sifting through redundant information. A study published in the Journal of General Internal Medicine indicated that clinicians spend 52% of their time on EHR-related tasks, with a significant portion dedicated to documentation (4).

5. Training and Learning Curves

The adoption of new EHR systems requires extensive training for healthcare professionals to use them efficiently. However, the complexities of EHR interfaces and functionalities can lead to prolonged learning curves. During this period, healthcare providers may struggle with navigating the system, leading to additional time spent on routine tasks. A study published in JAMA Internal Medicine found that EHR adoption can reduce productivity during the initial stages of implementation (5).


Electronic Health Records were intended to revolutionize healthcare by streamlining processes and improving patient care. While EHRs offer several benefits, they have also introduced inefficiencies that generate busy work for healthcare professionals. The overwhelming data entry requirements, lack of interoperability, alert fatigue, extensive documentation needs, and the learning curve for EHR systems are all contributing factors to this issue.

To address these inefficiencies, healthcare organizations, policymakers, and EHR vendors must collaborate to implement user-friendly interfaces, prioritize interoperability, and provide comprehensive training to healthcare professionals. By doing so, we can transform EHRs into powerful tools that genuinely enhance healthcare delivery while minimizing the burden of busy work on the frontlines of patient care.


1. American Medical Association. (2016). AMA Study: Physicians spend nearly 2 hours on EHR tasks per hour of direct patient care. Retrieved from

2. Adler-Milstein, J., DesRoches, C. M., Furukawa, M. F., Worzala, C., Charles, D., Kralovec, P., … Jha, A. K. (2014). More than half of US hospitals have at least a basic EHR, but stage 2 criteria remain challenging for most. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21(4), 687–693. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002934

3. Gunderman, R. B., Koury, J. J., & Barnes, E. L. (2017). The Hidden Cost of Clinical Alarms. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 14(6), 827–829. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.046

4. Sinsky, C., Colligan, L., Li, L., Prgomet, M., Reynolds, S., Goeders, L., … Linzer, M. (2016). Allocation of Physician Time in Ambulatory Practice: A Time and Motion Study in 4 Specialties. Annals of Internal Medicine, 165(11), 753–760. doi:10.7326/m16-0961

5. Slight, S. P., Berner, E. S., Galanter, W., Huff, S., Lambert, B. L., Lannon, C., … Bates, D. W. (2015). Meaningful Use of EHRs: Experience of Four Critical Access Hospitals. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 22(6), 1154–1158. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocv024

13 views0 comments


bottom of page